Self-Ligating Brackets: An Overview

نویسندگان

  • Maen Zreaqat
  • Rozita Hassan
چکیده

The specialty of orthodontics has continued to evolve since its advent in the early 20th century. Changes in treatment philosophy, mechanics, and appliances have helped shape our understanding of orthodontic tooth movement. In the 1890‘s, Edward H. Angle published his classification of malocclusion based on the occlusal relationships of the first molars. This was a major step toward the development of orthodontics because his classification defined normal occlusion. Angle then helped to pioneer the means to treat malocclusions by developing new orthodontic appliances. He believed that if all of the teeth were properly aligned, then no deviation from an ideal occlusion would exist. Angle and his followers strongly believed in non-extraction treatment. His appliance, (Fig. 1), consisted of a tube on each tooth to provide a horizontally positioned rectangular slot. Angle’s edgewise appliance received its name because the archwire was inserted at a 90-degree angle to the plane of insertion. The rectangular wire was tied into a rectangular slot with steel ligatures (Proffit, 2000). A later shift in thought occurred when one of his pupils, Charles Tweed, observed that some of the patients formerly treated by Angle exhibited a noticeable amount of relapse. Tweed then re-treated a number of these cases by extracting four bicuspids to resolve the crowding and in turn, developed his own treatment mechanics. Another shift in orthodontics occurred when Larry Andrews introduced the straight wire appliance. Instead of bending wires to place teeth in the proper orientation with an edgewise bracket, Andrews‘ appliance had the angulation and torque values built into the brackets commonly known as the appliance prescription. In theory, these pre-adjusted brackets eliminated the need to repeatedly bend first, second, and third order bends each time the patient progressed to the next wire. The straight wire appliance revolutionized orthodontics by making the bracket much more efficient. Since then, many orthodontic companies have developed their own bracket systems with specific prescriptions, treatment philosophies, and mechanics. However, they all shared one common characteristic – ligatures must be placed around tie wings on brackets to hold arch wires in the bracket slot.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the frictional force (FR) in self-ligating brackets among different bracket-archwire angles, bracket materials, and archwire types. METHODS Passive and active metal self-ligating brackets and active ceramic self-ligating brackets were included as experimental groups, while conventional twin metal brackets served as a control group. All brackets were maxil...

متن کامل

Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.

OBJECTIVE To elucidate some of the parameters determining the frictional behavior of passive, active, and interactive self-ligating brackets during sliding mechanics. MATERIALS AND METHODS A custom jig mimicking the three-dimensional tooth movements that occur during sliding mechanics and an Instron testing machine were used to determine the resistance to sliding of six different self-ligatin...

متن کامل

Are self-ligating brackets an advantageous alternative for non-extraction treatments?

The objective of this nonsystematic review of the literature is to determine whether or not self-ligating brackets are an equally effective alternative to traditional brackets for non-extraction treatments. The agreed upon criteria are indications for extractions, the biomechanical approach, the stability of the treatment results, the iatrogenic effects and the ergonomics. The studies discuss a...

متن کامل

Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE To compare the amount of expressed frictional resistance between orthodontic self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets in vitro as reported in the literature. METHODS Several electronic databases (Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched without limits. In vitro studies that addressed friction of self-ligating brackets compared wi...

متن کامل

Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations

OBJECTIVE To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012